11 Return Policies That Only Made Sense in the ’90s
Return policies in the 1990s were often unusual compared to the streamlined systems we see today.
- Sophia Zapanta
- 4 min read
Before online shopping became the norm, stores relied on return rules that reflected the habits of the decade. Many of these policies seem outdated today because they were shaped by paper receipts, in-store exchanges, and slower technology. They highlight how shopping culture has changed over time.
1. Receipt Required for Every Return
Kaboompics.com on Pexels
Most stores in the 1990s refused any return without a paper receipt. Digital systems were not widely used, so clerks relied on physical proof of purchase. If a receipt was lost, the item could not be returned or exchanged. This policy made keeping paper slips essential for every shopper.
2. Store Credit Instead of Refunds
Anna Tarazevich on Pexels
Many retailers gave store credit instead of cash when items were returned. Shoppers received a slip or gift card tied to the store, which locked them into future purchases there. Cash refunds were less common and often required manager approval. This approach kept money within the store.
3. Limited Return Windows
Kaboompics.com on Pexels
Return windows in the 1990s were often very short, sometimes only 7 or 14 days. After the deadline passed, the item was considered a final sale. Stores enforced these dates strictly. Today’s common 30- or 90-day return policies were rare back then.
4. Exchanges Only
Kaboompics.com on Pexels
Some retailers only allowed exchanges for the same product rather than offering refunds. This meant customers could replace a broken or defective item but not get their money back. It kept inventory moving but limited shopper flexibility. Many stores later abandoned this approach as competition increased.
5. Restocking Fees
Tima Miroshnichenko on Pexels
Electronics and large appliances often came with restocking fees if returned. Customers could lose a percentage of the refund to cover “handling” costs. These fees discouraged unnecessary returns. While less common today, they were a standard part of 1990s retail.
6. Opened Media Could Not Be Returned
cottonbro studio on Pexels
CDs, VHS tapes, and video games could not be returned once opened. Stores argued this prevented customers from copying or recording the media before bringing it back. Defective items were usually exchanged for the same title only. This rule reflected the technology concerns of the time.
7. Clothing Tags Must Stay Attached
Ron Lach on Pexels
Clothing stores required tags to be intact for a return to be accepted. If tags were cut off, even if the item was unworn, it was considered a final sale. This policy discouraged people from wearing clothes once and returning them. It also made processing easier for staff.
8. Holiday Returns Were Strict
cottonbro studio on Pexels
Unlike today’s extended holiday return windows, many stores in the 1990s kept the same short deadlines even during December. Gifts bought early in the season often could not be returned after the holidays. This caused stress for shoppers and led to stricter gift planning. Retailers later expanded holiday policies due to customer demand.
9. No Returns on Sale Items
Sora Shimazaki on Pexels
Clearance and sale items often came with a strict “no return” label. Once purchased, they could not be exchanged or refunded. This was meant to prevent customers from taking advantage of discounted stock. Today, many stores allow returns even on discounted goods.
10. Photo ID for Returns Without a Receipt
Dom J on Pexels
If stores accepted a return without a receipt, they often required a photo ID. This was used to track the customer and prevent return fraud. Shoppers’ names could be flagged if they made too many no-receipt returns. While this still exists in some form today, it was especially strict in the 1990s.
11. Mail-In Manufacturer Returns
Abstrakt Xxcellence Studios on Pexels
Some products, especially electronics, could only be returned by mailing them to the manufacturer. Stores refused responsibility once the item left the shelf. Customers had to pay shipping costs and wait weeks for replacements. This was a frustrating but common process before widespread in-store warranties.