12 Vintage Sports Ads That Wouldn’t Run Today

This list examines 12 vintage sports ads that would be considered too controversial or inappropriate to run in today's world.

  • Daisy Montero
  • 4 min read
12 Vintage Sports Ads That Wouldn’t Run Today
Freek Wolsink on Pexels

These vintage sports ads show how much advertising has changed over time. Some promoted smoking, used stereotypes, or made claims that would never be allowed now. They may seem interesting or funny today, but they also remind us how different the rules used to be. Each one highlights why it would not work today.

1. Tobacco Brands Sponsoring Youth Sports

Camel cigarettes on Wikimedia Commons Camel cigarettes on Wikimedia Commons

Cigarette companies once proudly sponsored youth leagues and placed their logos on baseball programs meant for children. At the time, it was seen as brand loyalty, not a public health concern. Today, linking tobacco to kids’ sports would result in public outrage and immediate legal consequences.

2. Sexualized or Gendered Athletic Imagery

Jayson Hinrichsen on Pexels Jayson Hinrichsen on Pexels

Many ads leaned on outdated gender roles, showing men as rugged champions while women appeared in tight uniforms or as cheerleaders. These visuals reinforced narrow expectations about who belongs in sports. Modern advertising tends to promote inclusion instead of stereotypes.

3. Alcohol Advertising With Athletes

Pavel Danilyuk on Pexels Pavel Danilyuk on Pexels

Some ads featured athletes chugging beer or promoting liquor right beside their team logos. These messages blurred the line between performance and partying. Now, professional leagues avoid direct alcohol promotion to protect young fans and athlete reputations.

4. Doctors or Athletes Advocating Smoking

Iconographic Collection 571187i on Wikimedia Commons Iconographic Collection 571187i on Wikimedia Commons

There was a time when famous athletes and even doctors claimed cigarettes helped them relax or perform better. These ads gave smoking a sense of trust and respectability. Today, such endorsements are banned and considered dangerously misleading.

5. Racial Stereotypes or Colonial Tropes

SHVETS production on Pexels SHVETS production on Pexels

Vintage sports ads sometimes used caricatures or exoticized portrayals of non-white athletes, treating them as novelties rather than equals. Some visuals were outright offensive, relying on outdated colonial imagery. These portrayals would be called out instantly in today’s media landscape.

6. Quota-Style Premiums for Children

Kampus Production on Pexels Kampus Production on Pexels

Kids were once encouraged to sell magazines or collect proofs of purchase to earn sports gear or team merchandise. These promotions often exploited peer pressure and promised rewards for sales quotas. Today, regulations protect children from manipulative marketing tactics like this.

7. Ridiculous Performance Claims

RUN 4 FFWPU on Pexels RUN 4 FFWPU on Pexels

Some ads made laughable promises, like gear that would make you “run faster” or “hit farther than ever.” They relied on fantasy rather than fact, with no scientific basis to support it. Now, companies are held to strict truth-in-advertising rules.

8. Gender Role Reinforcement

Bono Tsang on Pexels Bono Tsang on Pexels

Old ads painted a very specific picture: boys were the athletes, girls were on the sidelines. The message was clear — sports were for men. Today’s marketing is far more aware of representation and avoids shutting out whole groups of people.

9. Use of Tobacco in Family or Child Contexts

Collins, Tudor Washington, 1898-1970, photographer on Wikimedia Commons Collins, Tudor Washington, 1898-1970, photographer on Wikimedia Commons

Some ads went even further and showed babies or young kids in scenes involving tobacco products. It was meant to be humorous or relatable, but now it reads as incredibly tone-deaf. Regulations today prevent any association between tobacco and family-friendly messaging.

10. Health Claims by Tobacco Brands

Claudio Centonze/European Commission on Wikimedia Commons Claudio Centonze/European Commission on Wikimedia Commons

Brands once claimed that smoking improved breathing, digestion, or even athletic focus. These bold statements were never backed by evidence. Today, such health claims would result in lawsuits and government penalties.

11. Endorsing Lead- or Asbestos-Heavy Equipment

Aram Dulyan (User:Aramgutang) on Wikimedia Commons Aram Dulyan (User:Aramgutang) on Wikimedia Commons

Older sports gear was often advertised as “indestructible” or “state-of-the-art,” despite containing harmful materials such as lead or asbestos. At the time, no one questioned the safety claims. Today, product safety laws would never permit these materials to be near children or athletes.

12. Celebrating Exclusivity and Masculine Aggression

Hassan Omar Wamwayi on Pexels Hassan Omar Wamwayi on Pexels

Some ads glorified a “tough guy” image, suggesting that only the strongest and most aggressive deserved to play. These messages pushed toxic masculinity and shut out anyone who did not fit the mold. Now, sports brands focus more on community, teamwork, and mental well-being.

Written by: Daisy Montero

Daisy began her career as a ghost content editor before discovering her true passion for writing. After two years, she transitioned to creating her own content, focusing on news and press releases. In her free time, Daisy enjoys cooking and experimenting with new recipes from her favorite cookbooks to share with friends and family.

Recommended for You

Top 10 Closers in MLB History

Top 10 Closers in MLB History

These 10 elite closers shut the door like no one else in baseball history.

15 Ads That Tried Way Too Hard to Be Edgy

15 Ads That Tried Way Too Hard to Be Edgy

These ads wanted to be rebellious or cool — but ended up confusing, cringey, or just plain weird.