17 Notorious Cases of Planned Obsolescence
The history of planned obsolescence is full of cases where companies intentionally made their products worse just to make sure you would have to come back and spend more money.
- Sophia Zapanta
- 13 min read
Planned obsolescence is the secret reason why so many of the things we buy today just do not seem to last very long. It is a business strategy where products are designed to have a short life so that companies can keep selling you new versions year after year. This way of doing business started a long time ago with lightbulbs and has since moved into our cars and our phones. It is a mix of clever engineering and ads that make us feel like our current stuff is old or out of style, even when it works fine. While this keeps the economy moving and creates jobs, it also creates a huge pile of trash and wastes our natural resources. Understanding these seventeen cases helps you see why your phone slows down or your printer breaks. It is a story about how we became a society that just throws things away.
1. The Lightbulb Cartel

Andy Mabbett on Wikicommons
Back in the early days of electricity, lightbulbs were actually built to last for thousands of hours. In nineteen twenty-four, a group of major manufacturers got together and formed a secret group to fix this problem. They realized that if bulbs lasted too long, their profits would eventually drop off. They forced every member to reduce the life of a standard bulb to exactly one thousand hours. If a company made a bulb that lasted longer, they were actually fined for being too good at their job. This was the first major example of companies working together to make a product worse on purpose. It set the stage for how businesses would think about sales for the next hundred years. It proved that shorter lives meant much higher profits for the people at the very top. I can definitely say that it worked.
2. Apple Slowing Down Phones

Kārlis Dambrāns on Wikicommons
In 2017, people discovered that Apple was using software updates to slow down older iPhones. Apple claimed they were doing this to prevent phones with old batteries from shutting down but never informed the users. People just thought their phones were getting slow and old. That’s why many went out and bought the newest model. This led to massive lawsuits and a public apology from the company. Apple was then forced to pay millions in settlements and started offering cheaper battery replacements to win back trust. It showed how companies use software as a tool to make you feel like your hardware is failing. It was a huge scandal that changed how we look at our updates. We now wonder if every new download is actually a trap to make us buy something new. It is a very frustrating reality.
3. Printer Ink Scams

Dinkun Chen on Wikicommons
Printer companies are some of the biggest offenders when it comes to forced obsolescence. One major brand was sued because it used microchips that told the printer a cartridge was empty, even when it still had plenty of ink left. In some cases, the printer would simply block itself from working until a brand-new and expensive cartridge was installed. This was a clear attempt to make sure customers kept buying ink even when they did not need to. It resulted in some of the first major legal actions under strict new laws. This practice is still common today, and it is why printer ink is often more expensive than high-end perfume. It is a business model built on waste and frustration for the average person. We all know the feeling of a printer refusing to work for no real reason.
4. General Motors Style Changes

UW Digital Collections on Wikicommons
In the 1920s, Henry Ford wanted to build a car that would last a lifetime, but the leaders at General Motors had a different idea. They introduced an annual model change, where the design of the car changed every year. Even if the engine stayed the same, the new colors and tailfins made last year’s car look outdated. This created a psychological feeling where people felt ashamed to drive a perfectly good car just because it looked old. It changed the car industry into a fashion business and forced people into a cycle of constant upgrading. It was a very clever way to sell more cars without actually making them better. This strategy is still used today in almost every industry, from phones to clothes. It is all about making you feel like you are falling behind.
5. Weakened Nylon Stockings

Wikicommons
When nylon stockings were first released in nineteen thirty nine, they were so strong that they were almost indestructible. Women loved them, but the company quickly realized that if the stockings never ran or tore, they would never sell anymore. The company reportedly told its chemists to go back and make the nylon weaker so that the stockings would snag and tear easily. This forced women to buy multiple pairs a year instead of just one pair for a lifetime. It is a classic example of a company taking a perfect invention and making it worse on purpose for profit. It shows that even when we have the technology to make things last, companies will choose money over quality every single time. It is a sad truth that has defined modern manufacturing. We have traded durability for profit.
6. Permanent Phone Batteries

GolhaMedia on Wikicommons
In the early days of cell phones, you could easily pop the back off and swap out a dead battery for a new one. Today, almost every major smartphone is glued shut, making it nearly impossible for a regular person to change the battery. Since batteries naturally wear out after about two years, this design choice essentially gives your thousand-dollar phone an expiration date. When the battery dies, most people find the repair so difficult or expensive that they just buy a whole new phone instead. This has become a standard way to limit the lifespan of modern electronics. It is a move that prioritizes corporate earnings over the needs of the environment or the user. We are forced to throw away a perfectly good screen and computer just because the battery is old. It is a huge waste of money.
7. Software Locks on Ink

Raimond Spekking on Wikicommons
One famous printer company faced major backlash for a software update that caused printers to stop working if they detected a third-party ink cartridge. The printers would show an error message saying the cartridge was damaged, even if it worked perfectly fine a day before. This was a sneaky way to force customers to buy official and much more expensive ink. Lawsuits in multiple countries eventually forced the company to pay out millions to affected customers. It showed how companies use software as a weapon to lock people into their specific ecosystem. They want to make sure you cannot go anywhere else for your supplies. It is a fight for control over the things we have already bought and paid for. We should be able to use whatever ink we want, but the companies do not agree.
8. Textbooks with New Editions

Yamasztuka on Wikicommons
The college textbook industry is famous for releasing new editions of books every few years with very few actual changes. They might move the chapters around or change the photos, but the core information stays exactly the same. By releasing a new edition, they make the older and cheaper used books obsolete because the professor will assign homework based on the new page numbers. This forces students to pay hundreds of dollars for a new book that is barely different from the one their older siblings used. It is a system designed to kill the used book market and keep profits high for the publishers. It is a huge burden on students who are already struggling to pay for their education. It is another example of how companies manipulate the market to prevent people from saving money.
9. Controller Drift Issues

Vu Hoang on Wikicommons
Many owners of modern gaming consoles have dealt with controller drift, where the character starts moving on its own without being touched. This happens because the internal parts are made of materials that wear down very quickly through normal use. Despite thousands of complaints and multiple lawsuits, the design remained largely unchanged for years. Many people were forced to buy new controllers or pay for repairs just to keep playing their games. It is a case where using cheaper and fragile parts turned an expensive piece of hardware into a recurring expense for fans. Companies know that gamers will eventually pay for a new one because they want to keep playing. It is a frustrating problem that shows a lack of respect for the customer. We expect better from such big brands.
10. Slowing Down Smart Televisions

LG전자 on Wikicommons
One major electronics company was fined in Italy for pushing software updates that significantly slowed down its older smart TVs. In some cases, the updates made the devices so buggy and slow that they were almost unusable. Similar to the smartphone cases, this pressure made users feel like their hardware was failing, when it was actually the software causing the trouble. It showed that the problem of forced aging through software was not just limited to phones, but was spreading to almost every smart device in the home. You buy a nice television expecting it to last ten years, but then the apps stop working after three. It is a sneaky way to get you back into the store to buy the latest model. It makes it very hard to trust the brands we buy. We deserve products that work.
11. The Printer Waste Pad

André Karwath on Wikicommons
Some printers are programmed with a waste ink pad counter that will shut the entire machine down after a certain number of pages. The printer will display a message saying it needs service, and then it will simply refuse to print anything else. While the ink pads do eventually get full, many printers hit this limit long before there is an actual risk of a leak. Since the cost of a professional repair is often as much as a new printer, most people just throw the whole machine away. It is a digital kill switch that turns a working tool into a piece of electronic waste. This is one of the most direct and honest examples of planned obsolescence. The machine is told to die even though it is perfectly fine. It is a slap in the face to every consumer who wants their tools to last.
12. Fast Fashion Waste

Industria de Diseño Textil S.A on Wikicommons
Companies like Zara and H&M have mastered the art of making clothes that are meant to be worn only a few times. They use thin fabrics and cheap stitching that fall apart or lose their shape after just a few washes. By releasing dozens of new collections every year, they also make last month’s clothes look socially obsolete. This combination of physical and psychological obsolescence has created a massive environmental crisis. People are now buying much more clothing than they did 20 years ago, and most of it ends up in a landfill within a year. It is a cycle of constant buying and throwing away that is not sustainable. They have traded quality and style for low prices and endless variety. It is a bad deal for the planet and for their wallets. People need to go back to better clothes.
13. The Sony Timer Legend

Yasuo Kuroki, Sony on Wikicommons
For years, there was a popular rumor about a secret timer hidden inside certain electronics. The idea was that the products were engineered to break exactly after the warranty expired. While no physical timer was ever found, many customers noticed a pattern of failures occurring just months after the one-year mark. This led to a huge loss of trust in the brand and forced the company to work harder on quality control. Whether it was intentional or just a result of using parts that were just good enough, it became a legendary example of perceived planned obsolescence. It shows that even if a company is not doing it on purpose, using cheap parts creates the same result for the user. We want things that last longer than the paper they are printed on. It is about building real trust.
14. Glued-in Laptop Parts

André Karwath on Wikicommons
Modern laptops often have the memory and storage soldered directly onto the motherboard. In the past, if you wanted a faster computer, you could just buy a cheap stick of memory and plug it in. Now, if you want more power, you have to buy a completely new laptop. This design choice makes it impossible to upgrade your machine as your needs change. It ensures that the laptop you buy today will be obsolete in a few years, with no way for you to extend its life. It is a move that turns a high-end computer into a disposable item. This practice is becoming more common across the industry, and it is a huge step backward for sustainability. We should be able to fix and upgrade the things we own. It is better for our bank accounts and for the environment. It is common sense.
15. Losing the Headphone Jack

Sam Stokes on Wikicommons
When smartphone companies started removing the headphone jack, they claimed it was to save space or to make phones waterproof. However, many saw it as a way to force people to buy expensive wireless earbuds. Since wireless buds have tiny batteries that cannot be replaced, they have a much shorter lifespan than a pair of wired headphones that could last for decades. This move turned a simple and universal technology into a disposable product that needs to be replaced every few years. It is a great way for companies to make more money, but it is a bad deal for the user. We lost a reliable feature and gained a new monthly expense for charging and replacing batteries. It is a classic example of removing something useful just to sell us a more expensive and fragile fix.
16. Bricking Smart Home Hubs

Dancingpolishcow on Wikicommons
In 2016, a company was bought by a larger tech giant, and they decided to simply shut down the servers that ran their smart home hubs. Overnight, people who had paid hundreds of dollars for a device found that it was now a completely useless plastic brick. Because the device required a connection to the company’s cloud to function, the owners had no way to keep it working on their own. This is a new form of obsolescence where a company can remotely kill a product you own just because they do not want to support it anymore. It is a very scary reality for anyone who buys smart home gear. You do not really own the product; you are just renting the right to use it until the company changes its mind. We need better laws to protect us from this kind of remote destruction.
17. Proprietary Charging Cables

Jacklee on Wikicommons
For years, every phone company had its own unique charging port, which meant you had to buy a brand-new set of cables every time you switched brands. Even within the same brand, they would occasionally change the connector to make all your old accessories useless. This created a massive amount of electronic waste and forced customers to spend billions on simple plastic cords. It took a new law to finally force companies to move toward a universal standard like USB-C to end this profitable cycle. This shows that companies will not stop these practices on their own; they have to be forced by the government. It is a victory for consumers, but it took a long time to get there. We are finally moving toward a world where one cable can work for everything. It is about time we did.