Dusty May Explains Transfer Portal Model as Michigan Reaches National Title Game
Michigan head coach Dusty May compared building his roster through the transfer portal to NBA roster construction as the Wolverines prepare for the 2026 national championship game.
- Glenn Catubig
- 3 min read
The Michigan Wolverines’ rise to the 2026 national championship game has been shaped by a roster built heavily through the NCAA transfer portal, and head coach Dusty May is embracing the modern construction of his team. As Michigan prepares for its biggest stage, May addressed how assembling a reshaped roster has fueled the program’s success.
May is completing the eighth season of his head coaching career and his second leading Michigan, where he has quickly transformed the program into a national contender. In just two seasons, he has guided the Wolverines to back-to-back deep NCAA Tournament runs, including a return to the Final Four.
This year marks a breakthrough moment, as Michigan advanced beyond the semifinal round and earned a spot in the national title game for the first time under his leadership. The achievement reflects both roster flexibility and rapid team development.
Ahead of Sunday’s championship pregame media session, May reflected on how the modern transfer landscape mirrors professional roster building, particularly in the NBA.
1. Transfer Portal Strategy and NBA Comparisons
May highlighted how roster construction in college basketball has evolved, emphasizing that success often comes from adapting to new player acquisition methods rather than relying solely on traditional recruiting. He noted that different programs find success in different ways. Drawing a parallel to the NBA, May referenced championship teams that are often built through a mix of drafting, trades, and free agency rather than continuity alone. He pointed to recent examples as evidence of this shift. He specifically cited the Oklahoma City Thunder’s championship model, noting that roster pieces like Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Isaiah Hartenstein arrived through different paths but still formed a cohesive unit. May’s point was that roster origin matters less than how effectively players are developed and integrated once assembled, a philosophy that has shaped Michigan’s roster approach.
2. Michigan’s Rapid Rise Under May
May’s tenure at Michigan has been marked by immediate success, continuing the momentum he previously built at Florida Atlantic. His ability to adapt quickly to roster turnover has translated into consistent winning results. The Wolverines finished the season with a 36–3 record, including a dominant 19–1 mark in Big Ten play. That performance secured a regular-season conference title and positioned them as a top national seed entering March. Although Michigan fell short in the Big Ten tournament final against Purdue, the team’s overall résumé was strong enough to secure an at-large NCAA Tournament bid. From there, they capitalized on their postseason opportunity. That bid ultimately became the foundation for their national championship run, as Michigan built momentum throughout the tournament and advanced to the final stage.
3. Championship Opportunity and Season Outlook
Michigan’s advancement to the national championship game represents a defining moment in May’s coaching career. It is his first opportunity to compete for a national title, adding significance to an already historic season. The Wolverines now enter the championship matchup with a 36–3 record and one of the most efficient tournament runs in the country. Their consistency has been a hallmark throughout both conference and postseason play. Their upcoming opponent, Connecticut, presents a final challenge in Indianapolis, where tip-off is scheduled for April 6 at 8:50 p.m. ET. The matchup will determine whether Michigan’s portal-built roster can complete its championship climb. Regardless of the outcome, Michigan’s season has already become a case study in modern roster construction and rapid program development under May’s leadership.