'I Don’t Like Co-Ownership'- McLaren CEO Zak Brown Questions F1 Integrity Amid Mercedes–Alpine Talks

The idea of two competing teams not being entirely independent is becoming harder to ignore in Formula One. What once felt like a structural nuance is now turning into a serious conversation about fairness and credibility.

For years, co-ownership and ‘A/B team’ dynamics stayed in the background, rarely questioned beyond internal discussions. That has changed with recent on-track moments involving drivers like Daniel Ricciardo, and the competitive positioning of teams such as Red Bull Racing and McLaren bringing the issue into sharper public focus.

At the core of the debate is a simple concern. When teams are linked through ownership or operational overlap, the expectation of independent competition starts to weaken, raising doubts about whether every decision is made in isolation.

With regulations tightening and competition intensifying, this is no longer a background issue. How Formula One chooses to address it could play a defining role in maintaining trust in the sport going forward.

1. McLaren CEO raises fresh concerns over co-ownership as Mercedes-Alpine move reignites F1 debate

*]:pointer-events-auto R6Vx5W_threadScrollVars scroll-mb-[calc(var(–scroll-root-safe-area-inset-bottom,0px)+var(–thread-response-height))] scroll-mt-[calc(var(–header-height)+min(200px,max(70px,20svh)))]" dir=“auto” data-turn-id=“request-69ea1dff-74b8-83e8-9b6c-e961a0d77d00-9” data-testid=“conversation-turn-22” data-scroll-anchor=“false” data-turn=“assistant”>

Speaking at a McLaren media event, Zak Brown addressed the growing debate around co-ownership in Formula One. ‘I’ve been saying for 10 years, I don’t like co-ownership, I don’t like A/B teams,’ the McLaren CEO said, making his stance clear amid fresh developments in the sport. His comments come after Mercedes confirmed interest in acquiring a stake in Alpine, reigniting concerns over multi-team influence. Brown suggested that such structures risk blurring competitive lines at a time when the sport is pushing for tighter regulations and fairness. Pointing to recent examples, he added, ‘We’ve seen fastest laps taken away to help another team, we’ve seen IP transfer and staff moving overnight while others have to wait.’ The McLaren boss emphasized that these factors can create both sporting and cost cap advantages, raising deeper questions about parity on the grid. Drawing a broader comparison, Brown concluded that such a system would not be fair in the Premier League. He reiterated that co-ownership and A/B team structures are ‘not a healthy place for the sport’ and should be reduced rather than expanded.

2. Perception vs Reality: Why co-ownership Is becoming an F1 credibility issue

*]:pointer-events-auto R6Vx5W_threadScrollVars scroll-mb-[calc(var(–scroll-root-safe-area-inset-bottom,0px)+var(–thread-response-height))] scroll-mt-[calc(var(–header-height)+min(200px,max(70px,20svh)))]" dir=“auto” data-turn-id=“request-69ea1dff-74b8-83e8-9b6c-e961a0d77d00-13” data-testid=“conversation-turn-30” data-scroll-anchor=“false” data-turn=“assistant”>

The debate around co-ownership in Formula One is no longer just technical, it is increasingly about how the sport feels to its audience. By using relatable comparisons, Zak Brown shifts the discussion from regulation to perception. ‘Can you imagine a Premier League game with two teams under the same ownership,’ he said, framing the issue in a way that highlights the imbalance without relying on technical jargon. The comparison makes the concern instantly understandable beyond the F1 ecosystem. This reflects a wider shift in how such issues are being viewed. It is not only about rules being followed, but whether the competition appears fair when teams have underlying connections. As scrutiny grows, the emphasis is moving toward trust and credibility. In that sense, the concern is not just what is happening behind the scenes, but how it shapes the way fans interpret the sport going forward.

3. F1 news today: Ferrari upgrades and Red Bull uncertainty adds new layer to F1 power shift

*]:pointer-events-auto R6Vx5W_threadScrollVars scroll-mb-[calc(var(–scroll-root-safe-area-inset-bottom,0px)+var(–thread-response-height))] scroll-mt-[calc(var(–header-height)+min(200px,max(70px,20svh)))]" dir=“auto” data-turn-id=“request-69ea1dff-74b8-83e8-9b6c-e961a0d77d00-16” data-testid=“conversation-turn-36” data-scroll-anchor=“false” data-turn=“assistant”>

Fresh developments across Formula One suggest the competitive landscape is continuing to shift beyond just the co-ownership debate. Reports indicate that Lewis Hamilton is set to benefit from new upgrades at Ferrari, signaling renewed momentum for the team as it looks to close performance gaps. At the same time, uncertainty continues to surround Max Verstappen and his long-term future with Red Bull Racing. Ongoing internal changes, combined with performance struggles, have led to increasing speculation about whether the reigning star could eventually move on. This comes amid a broader period of transition within Red Bull, where key personnel exits and competitive inconsistency have raised questions about stability. The shifting balance of power on the grid is no longer just about race results, but about long-term positioning among the top teams. Taken together, these developments underline a larger narrative unfolding in the sport. As teams like Ferrari push forward and uncertainty lingers around Red Bull, the competitive order in Formula One could be entering a defining phase heading into the next cycle.

• Tags:
• McLaren
• Red Bull
• Mercedes
• Formula One