NASCAR Trial: Steve O’Donnell Admits to $61M Loss in Courtroom Shocker

If you thought your latest Steam sale splurge was bad for your bank account, wait until you hear what’s going down in the NASCAR antitrust trial. We are currently in Day 4 of the legal battle that feels less like a courtroom procedural and more like a chaotic cutscene from a management sim gone wrong.

The headline act? NASCAR President Steve O’Donnell taking the stand and dropping a financial bombshell that has everyone checking their calculators.

It turns out, taking stock cars to the streets of Chicago and down to Mexico City wasn’t just a logistical nightmare—it was a financial black hole.

Let’s be real for a second. We all know that expanding a sport costs money. You have to spend money to make money, right? But O’Donnell revealed a number that would make even the most reckless GTA V player wince.

1. The $61 Million Dollar “Investment”

According to the courtroom testimony, NASCAR has torched a staggering $61 million over the last three years on experimental races.The breakdown is painful. O’Donnell admitted that the Chicago Street Course alone was responsible for a $55 million loss over three years. Then, toss in another $6 million loss for the Mexico City race. If you’re doing the math at home, that is a lot of zeroes for events that were supposed to be the “future” of the sport. But here is where the spin comes in. O’Donnell claims this wasn’t just setting cash on fire for the fun of it. He insists these massive losses were necessary evils to court a very specific, very wealthy suitor: Amazon. In what sounds like a classic “my dog ate my homework” excuse, O’Donnell essentially told the court that Amazon—NASCAR’s first fully direct-to-consumer media partner—wouldn’t have even looked in their direction if it wasn’t for the Chicago street race. The narrative O’Donnell is pushing is pretty clear: We had to bleed money on the streets of Chicago so we could secure the bag with the streaming giant. It’s a bold defense. It frames a $55 million loss not as a failure, but as a loss leader for a media rights deal. However, when you are sitting in court accused of being a monopoly that strangles team profits, admitting you blew $60 million while teams are fighting for scraps is… a choice. Speaking of monopolies, the tension in the room regarding NASCAR’s power over the sport is thicker than the tire smoke at Daytona. Throughout nearly five hours of testimony, O’Donnell didn’t exactly scramble to deny the monopoly allegations. The plaintiffs (23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports) are painting a picture of an authoritarian regime where teams have zero leverage.

2. The Monopoly Question

Judge Kenneth D. Bell seems to be leaning that way too, noting in a previous statement that NASCAR plainly exercises power in the market. The barriers to entry are huge. You can’t just start a rival stock car series in your backyard. O’Donnell also touched on the “open team” concept, admitting that if the current plaintiffs lost sponsors, they’d likely go out of business. Sure, they could compete as open teams in 2026, but the payout would be pennies compared to what chartered teams get. It’s essentially telling a pro gamer they can still compete in the tournament, but they have to play with a broken controller and zero prize pool support. Perhaps the most relatable part of this entire saga is Judge Bell, who is officially over it. He issued a warning to the lawyers that would make a strict raid leader proud. He told both sides to pick up the pace because the jury is going to revolt if this drags into a third week.

3. Judge Bell is Losing Patience

He wants witnesses to stop dodging questions and lawyers to stop beating dead horses. When a federal judge has to tell you to stop wasting time, you know the vibes in the courtroom are rancid. With O’Donnell laying bare the financials, the curtain has been pulled back on the “France Family Trust” empire. We know Denny Hamlin is pulling in around $14 million a year at Joe Gibbs Racing, but the fight here isn’t about driver salaries—it’s about the sustainability of the teams themselves. As the trial continues, the defense that “we lost millions to save the sport” is going to be tested hard. O’Donnell might view a $61 million loss as a strategic play for Amazon, but to the teams suing them, it looks a lot like mismanagement from a monopoly that refuses to share the wealth. Stay tuned, folks. If Day 4 was this spicy, the verdict is going to be legendary.

• Tags:
• Steve O'Donnell